wrong declaration of rss feed?
This is an open discussion with 2 replies, filed under General.
Search
The feed is RSS 2.0. Adding the Atom
namespace doesn’t automatically deem it as an Atom feed. The namespace is for the atom:link
declaration, which is recommended by the specification for greater interoperability between different feed readers.
See link: http://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/warning/MissingAtomSelfLink.html
I see. Thank you for explaining this.
Create an account or sign in to comment.
I noticed when looking at the source of rss feed of this forum as well as your site’s blog that xml declaration looks strange:
The feed itself looks more like an RSS 2.0 than the Atom feed, and besides that, I think there is no such thing as Atom version 2.0 - it’s either Atom 0.3 or Atom 1, I’ve never heard of Atom 2.0
Also, item in Atom are identified by
<id>
tag, but in your feed it’s<guid>
.<guid>
tag is usually used in rss feed.I am not sure, since I am not an expert in feed formats, but it just looks like you are using rss 2.0 while declaring namespace of Atom feed